The fact of the matter is that ALL of the virtualization companies have their own agreements with Apple that prevent THEM from allowing Snow Leopard to be installed and specifically allow for Snow Leopard Server. It actually started due to some Tech Support geek at Parallels quoting the EULA in a Support Document originally (as noted in a post above) and Parallels keeps updating that same document for newer versions of OS X without correcting it. It was a common myth that the Snow Leopard EULA prohibited its use in a virtualized environment on a Mac. It just seems to me that the $30 to purchase Snow Leopard Server is SO much easier to install and operate in a virtualized environment and the "Server" apps are easily removed from The Dock, so as to not confuse anyone.
I stick with Parallels, even though it costs real money, because they have consistently updated it to provide such needed features as: copy/paste between environments and ease of file sharing, too. Leopard Server cost 999 for an unlimited-client license, Snow Leopard Server cost 499, and Lion Server costs 50.or this reason alone, Lion Server will (and should) attract the attention of people who have never been in the market for server software before - home users, in particular - but it has to do so without alienating the business.
My thread, explains in detail the procedures for installing both Snow Leopard and Snow Leopard Server into Parallels: Click to expand.What is your conclusion I suspect that it will work fine!
0 kommentar(er)
